Comparison

Curator vs FileBot

FileBot has been the go-to tool for renaming media files for years, and it's genuinely good at it. Curator does the same core job — cryptic filenames in, clean correctly-named files out — but as a fast native app with a modern interface, and it carries on past the rename into a collection you'll actually open for fun. Here's an honest comparison so you can pick the right one.

Feature Curator FileBot
Built with Native Rust app, around 12 MB Java (runs on the JVM), larger download
Interface Modern, Apple-like, light and dark Functional and utilitarian
Platforms macOS, Windows, Linux macOS, Windows, Linux
Metadata sources TheTVDB, TheMovieDB, Trakt TheTVDB, TheMovieDB, AniDB and more
Matching Automatic, with a confidence score and a poster picker when it's unsure Automatic, with manual override
Collection / poster wall Yes — a browsable library No — a renamer only
Completion tracking Yes — % owned and a missing-episodes report No
Presentation mode Yes — full-screen poster slideshow No
Command line & scripting Not yet Yes — a powerful CLI and format scripting
Music & anime renaming Focused on TV and film Yes — broader format support
Licensing Offline-verifiable, 2 computers, no phone-home lockout Paid licence required
Track record New in 2026 Long-established

Where Curator is different

Curator is built in Rust as a real installed app, so it's small and quick rather than a packaged web browser or a Java program waiting on a runtime. The matching shows a confidence score for every file and, when it isn't sure, lets you pick from a wall of posters instead of guessing. Everything you file lands in a collection with quality badges and ratings, and Curator can tell you which episodes of a season you're still missing.

Licensing is deliberately gentle. Your licence is verified on your own machine, so the app doesn't lock you out when it can't phone home — a common frustration with software that checks in constantly. One licence covers two of your computers, and you can move it between them.

Where FileBot still wins

Honesty matters more than a sales pitch, so: if you want to automate renaming from a script or a watch folder, FileBot's command line and format expressions are excellent and Curator doesn't match them yet. FileBot also handles music and anime libraries and a wider set of sources, and it has years of real-world use behind it. If those things are central to how you work, FileBot is the better fit today.

So which should you choose?

If you want a tidy, native app that names your TV and films correctly and turns your library into something worth browsing, Curator is built for you. If you live on the command line or need music and anime support, stay with FileBot. Curator has a 14-day free trial with no card required, so the easiest answer is to try it on your own messy folder.

Download the free trial See the features